fireun: (gaara wtf)
fireun ([personal profile] fireun) wrote2011-01-04 04:48 pm

Of all the....

 [livejournal.com profile] otterdance  has an excellent discussion on the editing of Huck Finn.

When we get to the point where we are editing works of literature that reflect a period we are really missing the point of writing. And reading. Have dialog with your students instead of washing over anything that could inspire discussion. We aren't teaching at this point if we take away anything there is to teach. Editing works to fit modern asinine feelings of what is and is not appropriate is a failure of gross proportions to take something of value from these works, even if that value is nothing more than a discussion of why a certain word/topic/idea is offensive/hurtful/inappropriate. We cannot learn and grow if we merely decide to wash things away.

[identity profile] oracle-dreams.livejournal.com 2011-01-04 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Very interesting but also an ages old dilemma. Very similarly, I was watching a show on Ovation - Secret Museums.

http://www.ovationtv.com/programs/1052-secret-museums

They were discussing the depiction of sex in art and the hidden galleries etc, that showcased them (the Victorians ones are so intriguing!) throughout the ages. It always goes back to, the supposed urban myth, that the vatican has the largest collection of porn in the world. Of special interest, the vatican employed artisans specifically to castrate all the classical statues and paste their more modest fig leaves in place. The myth says they kept the penises. This show SHOWED drawer after drawer of those severed penises. What a show that would be, on so many levels...

Anyway, censorship isn't going away. Just as criminal now as it was then and still just as prudish.

[identity profile] amethyst-clan.livejournal.com 2011-01-04 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
oh for the love of gods...
-facepalms-

Gods forbid we teach our children critical thinking skills.

[identity profile] bleedtoblue.livejournal.com 2011-01-04 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Editing is just not the same thing as censoring, removing the "offensive passages" is censorship.

[identity profile] sorion.livejournal.com 2011-01-05 06:13 am (UTC)(link)
Why don't we stop reading altogether...? Works of art always have to be read in the context of their time. Simple as that.
And here my grandmother always complains about the language of the youth... ;)

[identity profile] libwitch.livejournal.com 2011-01-05 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
The only thing that surprises me (sadly) is that this is NEWS to some people - its been done before. Perhaps not in this format. But movie/tv adaptions have been edited; and since the book has been banned many many times for this very reason, logic only follows that this would happen.

I am not saying it is right, but society is actually THIS STUPID.